return to BR EXTRA

Interview with Alligator Records' Bruce Iglauer

Alligator Records is celebrating its 30th anniversary in blues. In honor of this achievement, we conducted an in-depth interview with Alligator founder and president Bruce Iglauer, who recounted the label's history, discussed its business philosophy, and gave fond reminiscences of Albert Collins, Hound Dog Taylor, and other artists he worked with during the past three decades.

Here's what he had to say.

Tell us about the label's early days. What did Alligator start out knowing that other labels didn't?

Well, I knew that if I was going to make records I had to be a good businessman, and so I started with the concept that I was going to be more aggressive than other labels I saw around me at that time.

I started out knowing, for example, that progressive-rock radio stations existed and that they would be open at that moment in 1971 to playing blues records. That wasn't true by 1975, when most of them become AOR stations. Blues had been eliminated from the playlists.

I was prepared to give away a lot more LPs to radio than my competitors were, and to follow up with lots of phone calls and mailings. I remember sitting on the floor of my one-room apartment with my portable typewriter, typing labels to send "Thank you, Hound Dog Taylor" posters to everyone who had played the album, each with an individual note.

Still, 30 years is nearly unheard of in this business. What's enabled Alligator to survive for so long?

The first reason we've survived is that we've made some really great records, and the second reason is that we've been aggressive about marketing those records. We've always felt that we're not just selling the records, we're selling the artists. We want people to feel as though they're not just buying a piece of vinyl or a round piece of metal or plastic, but that they're getting a slice of human being in their living room.

Did you find that you not only had to market your artists, but that you in fact had to market "blues" - as a genre - to the public?

I feel like I've tried to be a crusader for the blues. I wanted to bring the blues community together and get the artists in front of a larger audience. I feel like I've been a proselytizer; I wanted to convert people to the "religion" of the blues. As a businessman, I hope they'll grow to like my artists. But if they come to blues festivals and blues clubs and never buy an Alligator record, it's still a good thing. Because ultimately we need a larger fan base for this music.

It's frustrating, because 48 percent of people in the U.S. who buy records say that they "like" or "very much like" blues. Yet according to the Recording Industry Association of America, only about one and a half percent of all the records sold in the U.S. are blues records. And that's using a pretty loose definition of blues. It's frustrating that half of the people in the U.S. say blues is part of what they like, and yet a tiny percentage are actually buying the records. So we need to get those people more excited.

Any theories on why blues doesn't have a larger audience?

Blues is a music of grown-up emotions, and not necessarily a music of easy emotions. I like to say that listening to the blues is kind of like ... if you imagine yourself a wet sponge getting wrung out, your wringing-out process is kind of painful, but at the end you'll feel a lot better. Blues is more emotional and more adult music than a lot of pop music, and that's one reason radio is afraid of blues. It's a little too strong a statement for the radio.

And there's the problem that blues is perceived as "black music," and we live in a majority white country, and the fact is that the majority of white people listen to white musicians. There are plenty of black blues fans, and there are plenty of white blues fans who are comfortable listening to black artists, but there are also plenty of white people in the U.S. who never listen to black musicians because they don't think black musicians have anything to say to them. And unfortunately, there are plenty of radio programmers who think that if they want to reach a primarily white audience, the best way to do so is to play primarily white musicians. They think their audience wants to listen to people who look just like them, so they perpetuate racial stereotypes of "black music for black people" and "white music for white people."

I don't think they're sitting around being racist. I am not suggesting that they are sitting there saying, "Keep those black people off the radio." I think they think, "If we want 30-year-old white men to listen to this radio station, we will play records by 30-year-old white men, because that's what our potential audience will relate to." I think its very subconscious, but true.

It's interesting that a vast majority of black artists you hear on rock 'n' roll radio stations are dead. Why? Because a vast majority of black artists you hear on rock 'n' roll radio stations are Jimi Hendrix. He's the only one. If we're dead, we can't move into your neighborhood and marry your sister now.

The one blues artist who's had acceptance at triple-A radio is Keb' Mo'. And as much as I like Keb' Mo', he's made his blues a little less edgy. He's the black guy you want to move into your neighborhood and marry your sister, because you know he'll mow his yard and paint his house and lend you his garden tools. To ignore racism issues in blues is to be unrealistic.

(continue to part 2)

1 2 3 4 5

Send a comment to Blues Revue.

All material on this site is Copyright © 2009 Visionation, Ltd.